At 2 hours, 37 minutes, this felt a lot longer than The Hobbit's 2 hours, 46 minutes. Despite that, I never once checked the time. There was enough going on that I felt absorbed by the whole spectacle.
Perhaps spectacle isn't the right word. While there was plenty of it when necessary, this film had a touch more grit than I initially expected. In that respect, the production design was extremely well done. The transformation of Jean Valjean from scarred and bedraggled ex-con to well-groomed Mayor and so on was well done.
Hugh Jackman did (as I had expected) a remarkable job as Jean Valjean. Anne Hathaway was pretty decent as Fantine, though her facial expressions are a bit too animated when singing "I Dreamed a Dream." When you see it, you'll know what I mean. Amanda Seyfried and Samantha Barks worked well as Cosette and Eponine respectively, both in looks and voice. Eddie Redmayne was really good as Marius, though there were a few times that the close-up of his face did not do him any favors. I'm speaking in terms of his quivering chin, and not his actual looks. He looked the part, he played it well, and for the most part, his singing was decent. Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter as the Thenardiers were spot on.
Poor Russell Crowe, though. As The Wife pointed out, she thought our friends were being theatre snobs about his performance. They were not. For the most part, he looked the part of Javert with the exception of needing a razor. Javert's back story was that he was "born inside a jail" (those are the actual lyrics) to a convict father and gypsy mother. He renounces them both and begins working in the prison; the same one where he oversees a convict named Jean Valjean. Javert needs to be in stark contrast to his background and familial ties. As such, it requires him to be buttoned-down and well-groomed despite his "need to prove" and brutish attitude toward those like his parents. Again, Russell Crowe could look the part, if only they had given him a shave with his haircut. Then again, that wouldn't have solved my problem with him. I'll get to that in a second.
For his part, I expected more out of director Tom Hooper after The King's Speech and the John Adams mini-series. The camera work felt sloppy at times. The use of handheld cameras was done well in the scenes where it felt like you were running through the streets with Marius, Enjolras, and the rest of the revolutionaries. What did not work with the photography was that, with the exception of the crane shots at Le Marque's funeral and at the end, it was almost always shaky. To that end, there were times when people were singing and they would move, but the camera wouldn't follow them right away. Example 1: Fantine has just died, Valjean and Javert are singing at each other in the hospital, but Hugh Jackman's face from the nose up is not on screen. Example 2: Eponine is singing "On My Own" in the rain. While leaning against a doorway, she sinks down to the ground in defeat that Marius will never be hers. The camera doesn't follow right away, and the frame is empty before it swings down onto her again. It reminded me of amateur theatre where a spotlight operator doesn't know what he's doing and can't keep track of the person on stage they are supposed to be following. In this regard, it felt less like being there with them and more like an overzealous film student.
Returning to Russell Crowe's singing. It was Hooper's decision that the actors "sing live," meaning that they sang while they were filming and dubbed in the score later, rather than recording the songs in a studio and having the actors mouth it in later. Hooper did this because he wanted it to feel "raw and real." What you are left with is a Javert that only sings five notes. And while Hugh Jackman and Anne Hathaway have proven in the past that they can sing, and sing very well, some of their most well-known songs only sound vaguely reminiscent of their stage musical originals. In a few places, this worked, specifically "A Little Fall of Rain" and "A Heart Full of Love." There were others that were just as good. It was an interesting choice, but just because it's something that hasn't been done before, it doesn't mean you should do it.
Perhaps the most surprising performances were those of Aaron Tveit as Enjolras and newcomer Daniel Huttlestone as Gavroche. Stole the show.
But for all of my grievances listed above, it was an amazing film to watch. It looked the right way, hit almost all of the right marks, and left me feeling satisfied. Just don't expect me to run out and buy the soundtrack. I'll stick with the original cast symphonic recording in my car (that I stole from The Wife).
Word to the Nerd
20 comments:
I'll probably watch it on NetFlix. But I have seen the original production years ago in London, so the movie will have a lot to live up to.
Jackman did theater before he did movies, so no surprise he did a good job.
I haven't seen it, but I want to very much.
I really want to see this one. It's on the list.
I love the original cast recording, that's usually my problem with musicals. I want to hear the original cast and the new cast always (almost) lets me down.
I have yet to see this story in any form. But its on my list of films to see. Thanks for the review.
I agree with what you said about Aaron Tveit. He should have been cast as Marius instead, but there's nothing I can do about that. I enjoyed the movie, it was a lot more emotional than I expected it to be, but sometimes Hugh Jackman's Talk-singing bothered me. Still, I would watch it again.
Funny, all my friends said the same thing about Russell Crowe. Haven't seen it yet because I'm not sure I want to replace memory of opera Les Miz with movie one.
It definitely was a lot more raw than I thought it would be. I enjoyed it, for the most part. Crowe was definitely a low point. And this might be nitpicky, but hubby and I both thought the whole Santa thing wasn't needed at all.
this is exactly why the role should've gone to Paul Bettany as it was originally planned and not to Crowe. Everybody is trashing him around the web.
i'm with dezz (even though i haven't seen the film yet)... but then, i tend to think most EVERY role should be given to paul bettany. :D
I don't think i'll find the time to see this in theaters, which stinks, but your review seems to match a lot of other reviews. I'll just have to be patient i suppose
I agree about Russell Crowe, but I loved seeing so many new developments of the characters because the camera could get up close, because relationships could develop like they can't on the stage. And yes on the soundtrack.
I'm not a huge fan of this musical to begin with, so I may wait and watch on dvd. Peanut, however, LOVES this musical (watched it with her grandparents on PBS one time, I think).
I admit I loved Les Mis and now will always loved it. I'm going to try to make time to see the stage play in London in the future *fingers crossed* and hope it is still playing.
Russell Crowe, Hugh Jackman and Amanda Seyfriend were ok. But what stood out was Anne Hathaway, Samantha Barks and somewhat Amanda Seyfried - they're voices were excellent and went into an awesome sopranos.
I found Les Mis needed more talking, less singing. I got so into the music that I forgot about the meaningful story. I feel like I should see it again and just concentrate on the story.
I see most movies on their first run - on opening weekends. I don't wait a few weeks in, I prefer seeing the movies right away. But sometimes I wait for DVD if I feel like the film will be the waste of my money.
Great review! :)
Oooooh, thank you for the review. Wednesday wants to see it so badly.
I read the unabridged book last year, and I cannot WAIT (though I must) to wash that rambling mess out of my brain with the film version.
This flick seems to be one people either love or hate. Appreciate your honest review.
I know nothing of the story.
I am a RUBE.
Not a musical fan but I do love Les Mis. Not sure if I'll see this or not, still haven't watched the 2000 version. Javert is awesome.
I'll probably give this one a miss. Not a big fan of serious musicals so it'll be low on my list.
Jamie
Not my cup of tea.
Nice review though :).
I'm excited to see this one too!
Post a Comment